🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime category has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and grammar: police body cam footage. Faces of victims, observers and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of vehicle beams or flashlights as the police arrive, their faces and voices expressing caution or panic or anger or dubiously feigned naivety. And we often catch sight of the expressions of the officers themselves, one waiting impassively while the other conducts the inquiry with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though perhaps this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have previously seen the Netflix real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the slaying of an social media personality by her boyfriend, whose main point of interest was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the grim case of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids reportedly bothered and antagonized her neighbor, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighborhood conflicts in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, the accused fatally shot Owens through her locked door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Police Inquiry and State Laws

The arresting officers found evidence that Lorincz had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit residents and others to shoot if there is a significant presumption of threat. The documentary constructs its narrative with the officer recordings captured during the repeated police visits to the location before the killing, and then at the horrific and chaotic incident site itself – prefaced by emergency call recordings of the caller contacting authorities in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really imply anything too complicated about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is obviously disturbed, although the children are heard calling her “the Karen”, an hurtful taunt. The film is showcased as an example of how self-defense regulations generate senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the reality of gun ownership and the second amendment (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit notoriously said made gun deaths a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel surprised at how little interest the police took in this aspect. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? How was the gun kept in her home? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in recordings that didn’t make the edit). Or is possessing a firearm so normal it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or bread heaters?

Detention and Consequences

For what appeared to her local residents a extended period, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another parallel, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an extraordinary sequence in which Lorincz simply declines to rise, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the closing credits. A deeply sobering portrayal of American crime and punishment.